- “The poor increase like fleas and lice, and these vermin will eat us up unless we enclose” Pseudomismus (17c) on enclosure of the land
- “No man has any right to buy and sell the earth for private gain” from the song about the Diggers: The World Turned Upside Down by Billy Bragg
St George’s Hill, the ‘Common Land’ where the Diggers settled, is now a private estate of over 400 mansions. It has golf and tennis clubs, and the roads and verges belong to its residents’ association. This is Socialism for the rich!
At the time of the Diggers (1649), 30% of land was held in common and they complained that this land was being stolen ‘By theft and murder’, and that enclosure meant that their freedom to use open land, a birthright, was being taken away.
Ownership of land has historically contributed to extremes of wealth and poverty. It confers status and political power to individuals. Land ownership encourages speculation and abuse – such as fracking and blood sports. It forces up the cost of housing when there is a shortage, and in this time of climate emergency, it will allow the rich to buy their way out of the worst effects of the global crises, while the poor bear the brunt.1
Today the aristocracy and the corporations and the church, 1% of the population, own half of England.2
And the Royalty the Lords and the gentry still pass this land down the male line. William the Conqueror carved up Britain for his barons, such as the Groveners and the Percys, and their male offspring are still there today. In 2016 when the 6th Duke of Westminster died, his 26 year old son, who has elder sisters, inherited vast areas of land.
A history steeped in blood (Monty Python and the Holy Grail in Who owns England by Gary Shrubsole.)
Lord: How dare you come on my land, sir
Poacher: Your land! How do you make that out?
Lord: Because I inherited it from my father.
Poacher: And pray, how did he come by it?
Lord: It descended to him from his ancestors.
Poacher: But tell me how they came by it?
Lord: Why they fought for it and won it, of course
Poacher (taking off his coat): Then I’ll fight you for it.
Enclosure of the land forced people into the towns, and while workers became factory fodder, in appalling social conditions, the aristocracy took their land and added this to their estates, and then enriched themselves further through the slave trade. Although some of these estates today are open through the National Trust, their owners use this ‘public face’ to avoid paying tax. Much more land is still private, with no go areas used for their blood sports or for agriculture, drawing down large subsidies. In 2015 the ‘Land Barons’ received £28m, while smallholders aren’t eligible for a subsidy.
Industrialisation and the the dire consequences for the working classes led to a reaction that the ruling class feared would lead to revolution. Calls for reform were put forward, said by some to be the ‘social ransom’; the cost of appeasing the masses, with councils given more power to buy land. A remnant of this are allotments, a strip one twelfth of an acre was enough, it was said, to feed a family of four: (an acre is about two-thirds of a football pitch). And the 1919 Housing Act used this same measure to stipulate that there be no more than 12 houses to an acre.
The 1945 Labour Party Manifesto called for land nationalisation as a “radical solution for the crippling problems of land acquisition…in the interests of agriculture, housing and town and country planning alike”.
When in office however they backed away from nationalisation and instead introduced reforms to planning and taxation. Landowners refused to comply, effectively going on strike. In 1953 the Tories repealed even this.
Over the last forty years huge amounts of publicly owned land has been taken from us through waves of privatisation and austerity. Think of all the schools, colleges, hospitals, municipal buildings, railways and water utility land that is now privately owned. An explosion of cheap credit under Thatcher, Major and Blair fuelled a massive increase in house prices so developers are now forced to pay through the nose.
Land values have increased five fold since 1995, with the ‘Free market property-owning democracy’ only adding to the housing shortage and creating a property bubble, undermining the ability of the younger generations to find affordable homes
Private companies now own vast tracts of land. (18% in England and Wales! Much of it registered abroad to avoid tax) One of these is Peel Holdings worth £2.3b and owned effectively by John Whittaker, who lives on the Isle of Man, a tax haven. Peel Holdings have 300 separately registered companies in Britain. They own 37,000 acres of land in 1,000 sites, 150 of these in the North West. They own the Manchester Ship Canal, Salford Quays, Liverpool Airport, the Trafford Centre and most of the Mersey waterfront. Another is INEOS the chemical company, once ICI, whose owner is Jim Ratcliff, Britain’s richest man, who now lives in Switzerland.
Feudalism still exists! Land ownership lies at the heart of our unequal society. Everyone needs access to land for homes and work, so the “Nationalisation of land is a ‘Social Necessity’“. It is the single most important thing for the health and well-being of humankind.
The common use of the land, and sharing it for the benefit of all is essential. Not to do this will bring, is bringing:
- a homelessness crisis
- a collapse in species and natural habitats.
- a climate catastrophe leading to the loss of vast areas of land, and mass migration of peoples across the world
- war and disease
- *“The world is on course for ‘climate apartheid’” Philip Alston (UN special rapporteur on extreme poverty) https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/jun/25/climate-apartheid-united-nations-expert-says-human-rights-may-not-survive-crisis
- “Less than 1% of the population — including aristocrats, royals and wealthy investors — owns about half of the land” from ‘Who Owns England?: How We Lost Our Green and Pleasant Land and How to Take It Back by Guy Shrubsole* published by William Collins Also see: “land underlies our lives, but its ownership and control have been captured by a tiny number of people. The results include soaring inequality and exclusion; the massive cost of renting or buying a decent home; the collapse of wildlife and ecosystems; repeated financial crises; and the loss of public space.” https://www.resilience.org/stories/2019-06-10/want-to-tackle-inequality-then-first-change-our-land-ownership-laws/